Saturday, January 5, 2013

Community Democracy Projects Ballot Proposal Gathering Signatures early 2013

1


PETITION FOR SUBMISSION TO VOTERS OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE OAKLAND CITY CHARTER

Title of Proposed Measure: AN AMENDMENT TO THE OAKLAND CITY CHARTER REQUIRING IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A DEMOCRATIC BUDGET PROGRAM.


This measure would amend the City Charter to require that the City of Oakland implement and maintain a “Democratic Budgeting Program.”
 
Democratic Budgeting Program.
The Democratic Budgeting Program promotes active citizenship, community learning, and direct democracy by providing the residents of Oakland a governing process that allows participating residents to collectively determine how the budget of the City of Oakland is allocated through participation in the Neighborhood Assemblies and Citywide Committees designated herein.
 
PROPOSED TEXT OF INITIATIVE:
Proposed Charter Amendment -- Oakland City Charter, Section 801 and New Section 813 under Article VIII.
 
Article VIII-Fiscal Administration
Section 801. Budget

Amendment: Each department, office and agency of the City shall provide to Democratic Budget
Program (hereafter, DBP) personnel, officers, and Neighborhood Assemblies (NAs), in the form and at the time directed by the Mayor and City Administrator all information required by them to develop a budget conforming to modern budget practices and procedures as well as specific information, which may be prescribed by the Council. Under the direction of the Mayor and Council, the City Administrator shall prepare budget recommendations for the succeeding fiscal year. The Mayor shall present said budget recommendations to both the City Council and to the Congress of Directors. Following City Council Budget Hearings, Neighborhood Assembly Meetings, and Citywide Committee workshops, a public vote shall be conducted pursuant to Section 813 below, in which voters shall select either the original budget recommendations as prepared by the City Administrator under the direction of the Mayor and the Council, or the budget recommendations prepared by the Citywide Committees under the direction of participants in the Neighborhood Assemblies. The City Council shall adopt the budget of expenditures and appropriations as voted by the public for the ensuing year.
Section 813. Democratic Budget Program
This article establishes the Democratic Budget Program (DBP). The DBP is subordinate only to the Residents of Oakland; the DBP is on the same organizational level as the City Attorney, Mayor, City
Council, and City Auditor. Residents of Oakland shall be able to determine how the city’s budget is
allocated through a direct vote at Neighborhood Assemblies designated in this article.

I. The Democratic Budget Program Fund

(1) The annual budget for the DBP is initially equivalent to at least $2.55 million in 2012 dollars, to be adjusted in accordance with the inflation index. For the first five years, the COD can adjust line item levels upwards. After that point, the budget shall be subject to the standard budgeting process. Initially, the budget must include the following line items at the following levels.


 
 



1

2
Table 1


Item Percentage of total DBP budget


Salaries and benefits 51%

Neighborhood Assembly budgets 30%

Training and leadership development, for directors, organizers and coordinators 13%

Office and administrative expenses, including rent and mailing 6%

TOTAL 100%
 
(2) Salaries and benefits.
The following are floor amounts and can be adjusted upward by the COD.

a) Coordinators
Coordinators are FTEs compensated at least the following amount, in 2012 dollars to be
adjusted in accordance with the inflation index, plus benefits equivalent to $25,000 annually, in
2012 dollars to be adjusted in accordance with the inflation index.

Salary: $25 -33 hourly
$4,000-5,280 monthly
$48,000-63,360 annually

b) Organizers
Assuming a .5 FTE, Organizers are compensated at least the following amount, in 2012 dollars to
be adjusted in accordance with the inflation index, plus benefits equivalent to $12,000 annually,
in 2012 dollars to be adjusted in accordance with the inflation index.

Salary: $25 - 33 hourly
$2,000-2,645 monthly
$24,000 - 31,740 annually


II


Formation of the DBP (1)
District Launch Assemblies
Within thirty days after passing the initiative, the City Clerk’s office must notify all residents of Oakland of District Launch Assemblies, including a call for candidates for the Coordinator positions, and basic information about the DBP. The District Launches must be held within (10)ten weeks of passing the initiative. The City Clerk shall coordinate with the DBP Campaign Coalition and city departments (including but not limited to Neighborhood Services) to delegate responsibilities for planning, facilitating, and securing locations for the District Launch Assemblies. Decision-making at District Assemblies require a quorum of 75 district residents aged 16 and over.

a) Election of coordinators: Coordinators are chosen by majority vote. Coordinators for each
Council District will be chosen by eligible voters in that district. All eligible voters are eligible to
run. Interested parties must submit their petition for candidacy no later than three weeks after


2

3


notification of the District Launch Assemblies, accompanied by thirty signatures from eligible
voters in their district. Votes are cast at the District Launch Assemblies in a manner determined
and facilitated by the DBP campaign coalition.

b) DBP Campaign Coalition: The organizational representatives and community leaders that
comprise the DBP initiative campaign coalition, plus any other organizations or community
leaders they appoint to the Coalition.

c) Hiring of Organizers: Solicitations for applicants to the Organizer positions occurs at the
District Launch Assemblies , facilitated by the DBP campaign coalition. Organizers must be hired
by Coordinators within one month of the District Launch Assemblies. Coordinators must also
notify all district residents of the Organizer position openings.

d) Deadlines and Consequences: If notification deadlines described in this section are not met,
the City Administrator and City Council shall be docked in daily pay for each day of delay. These
funds will be transferred to the DBP Fund.

(2)
Neighborhood Launch Assemblies
Within four weeks after the District Launch Assembly, the City Clerk’s office must notify all residents of Oakland of the Neighborhood Launch Assemblies including a call for candidates for Director positions and Neighborhood Launch assignments by geographic area. Notification must occur by mail, phone, or face to face contact. Organizers-- once they are hired--shall assist in informing residents. The Neighborhood Launch Assembly must be held within seven weeks of the District Launch Assemblies. Coordinators will work with the appropriate City offices and the DBP campaign coalition to determine locations and any other logistics for the Neighborhood Launch Assemblies.

NA boundaries and Directors are determined at Neighborhood Launch Assemblies within each NCPC. To make these decisions, a minimum of seventy five residents who meet the definition of a “voting member” must be present at each Neighborhood Launch. Decisions at Neighborhood Launch Assemblies will be made by majority vote.

a)Determination of NA boundaries: Each Neighborhood Launch Assembly will receive a map of their NCPC. Coordinators will determine and facilitate a process by which participants will divide the NCPC district into NAs of 3000-5000 people each. The final NA boundaries must be decided by majority vote.

b) Election of directors: Any voting member of an NA may run for the position of Director.
Within 2 weeks after notification of the Neighborhood Launch Assembly, interested parties must submit their petition for candidacy and 20 signatures from eligible voters in their Council District. The Directors for each NA will be chosen as follows: candidates who received the first and second most votes will be appointed for a three year term; the remaining three candidates who receive the highest number of votes will be appointed for a two year term.This is to ensure that after the first two years of implementing the DBP, the terms of at least two experienced Directors will always overlap with the terms of newly elected Directors.

III. Neighborhood Assemblies

(1) Size
Neighborhood Assembly (NA) boundaries are based on the Neighborhood Crime Prevention Council


3

4


(NCPC) districts as of June 2012. The NCPC districts will be subdivided into NAs of 3,000-5,000 people. The subdivision boundaries will be determined by Neighborhood Launch Assemblies in each NCPC (see above). The Congress of Directors may propose changes to the following: NA boundaries; and minimum and maximum population thresholds for NAs. Proposals will be voted on by NAs at the time of the citywide budget vote in June.

(2) Meetings
NAs will hold meetings at least ten times per year during ten different months. The first NA meetings shall be held within one month of the Neighborhood Launch Assemblies. The meetings will be open to the public and publicized among residents of the NA. Coordinators must oversee the following public notification practices: (a) mailings and/or other forms of messaging such as email or text messages to NA residents at least one week prior to a meeting and two weeks prior to a city wide budget election; b) meeting notification posted online. Each meeting will last at least two hours, with at least one half hour devoted to information sharing and discussion of city departments and the budget. Meeting minutes will be accessible online. Additional topics of meetings may include but are not limited to general political, cultural, and educational matters--discussions, presentations, trainings, and performances.


a) Budget vote meetings


Once per year, at a meeting to take place in the first two weeks of June, NAs will host a vote on
the city budget.

(3) Voting Members
The voting members of an NA are the residents of the NA boundary who are aged 16 years or older and who are in attendance at an NA meeting. Proof of residence may be no more or less stringent than that used in acquiring a membership at an Oakland library. In order to vote on the city budget at the June meeting, NA members must have attended at least two prior meetings of any NA during the preceding year.

(4) Neighborhood Assembly Decision-Making Process
A quorum of thirty voting members is required for decision making in an NA. Voting members of NAs will make decisions based upon a majority vote, amendable later by the NA itself. Examples of decisionmaking include but are not limited to electing directors, putting forth a proposal to any committee, or creating a committee or subcommittee. An opportunity for deliberation is required before voting.

5) Directors
a)
Election of Directors Following Inaugural Year
The voting members of each NA will elect between three and five directors to collaboratively
administer the NA. In all subsequent elections after the inaugural year, all Directors shall be
limited to serving two-year terms and are eligible to serve multiple, non-consecutive terms.
Individuals interested in serving as Directors must first gather twenty signatures from residents
who live within the NA boundary supporting their nomination. NA voting members will elect
new Directors by majority vote at the end of an exiting Director’s term, which will fall in the
same month in which they were elected.

b)
Duties
Directors perform various facilitation duties, including but not limited to setting NA meeting
agendas, scheduling dates and securing locations for NA meetings; publicizing meetings, rolltaking
of meeting participants, leading NA decision-making processes, such as NA voting


4

5


systems, or stewardship of the NA Operating Funds and purchasing supplies for each meeting.

 
c) Training and Leadership Development
The TLD of Directors shall focus on two categories: leadership and local knowledge. Leadership
training includes but is not limited to building skills in facilitation and group decision-making,
communication and outreach, management, and organization. Local knowledge includes but is
not limited to increasing understanding of current and historical cultural and economic trends in
Oakland, the functioning of City departments, and issues impacting Oakland’s budget.

(6) NA Budget
Each NA is allocated a minimum of $7,560 per year (i.e. $630 per month) in 2012 dollars, adjusted for inflation, for meeting supplies and outreach materials. All funds not spent by the end of the fiscal year will be transferred back to the Democratic Budget Program Fund (DBPF).

(7) Neighborhood Assembly Education
The same financial information provided to city council and the mayor for the proper allocation of the budget shall be extended to DBP personnel, officers, and NAs.

(8) Location
The City of Oakland shall subsidize or make available at least one space that can accommodate a
minimum of 100 people each month for each participating NA. Directors are responsible for identifying and securing locations. The location shall meet the accessibility standards of public meetings (ADA).


IV. Personnel for Democratic Budgeting Program


The DBP shall be supported by two categories of paid personnel: Coordinators and Organizers. DBP
personnel are city staff and entitled to all of the rights and responsibilities afforded thereto.


(1)Coordinators


One Coordinator shall be hired per council district, and they shall have jurisdiction over that district.
Following the first year of the program (See “District Launch Assemblies”), Coordinators will be hired by the Directors of NAs in their district. Coordinators must live within the district in which they are hired. Coordinators shall promote the DBP to the public; serve as liaisons between NAs and city officials; ensure the popular education about the budget and city departments to the NAs; hire and oversee the work of Organizers; support the work of the Directors; support the leadership development of Directors; maintain the DBP’s web presence and databases; and administer NA budgets to Directors within their jurisdiction. In their role as liaison between city departments and residents, Coordinators shall ensure that educational and informational materials are appropriately and sufficiently prepared for NAs. In addition to administering the DBP fund, Coordinators shall produce a quarterly financial report to be made publicly available, and submit it to the Congress of Directors. The Coordinators must prepare basic introductory information about the budget process to be presented at the first NAs by Directors, local volunteers, and members of the DBP Campaign Coalition. Coordinators are city staff and are entitled to all of the rights and responsibilities afforded thereto.


(2) Organizers


The Coordinators shall hire three Organizers per council district. The Organizers work initially halftime, in collaboration with the Coordinators. (The number of Organizers and their weekly work-time are adjustable upwards at the discretion of the COD.) Organizers support the NAs within their district by performing outreach within their district, with a special emphasis on NA areas with lower rates of participation. Their tasks include door-to-door outreach, presentations to community groups, use of social media and other organizing methods to inform people in the community of NA activities, decisions and meeting agendas; conducting polls and surveys; helping organize the election process for NA Directors. Organizers may be called to assist with support for the CWCs and the COD, or under special circumstances as determined by the Coordinators or the COD. Organizers may be deployed outside their district. Organizers are paid an annual salary and benefits as delineated in the section on the DBP Fund. They are hired for year-long contracts. Organizers must be residents of Oakland. Preference is given to residents of the district for the position of Organizer. The contract of an Organizer is automatically renewed unless at the year-end review, the COD recommends against rehiring. If organizers are part of a union, the evaluation process and any firing or other changes to employment that result must comply with the union’s just cause for discipline clause.


V: Congress of Directors



Directors


The executive of the DBP is the Congress of Directors (COD) or any duly appointed committee

thereof.

(1) Function
The COD is made up of all NA Directors. It meets at least twice a year. All Directors are expected to
attend or to send a surrogate. The COD's functions include: 1) receiving, compiling, and preparing for vote proposals from NAs that have to do with changing how the DBP works; 2) overseeing the DBP staff; 3) collection and redeployment of leftover funds from the NAs; 4) amending as desired any amendable portions of the DBP that do not require a vote of the NAs; 5) reviewing the overall DBP budget; 6) overseeing the overall functioning of the DBP, including the citywide votes; 7) facilitate the exchange of information between City Departments and the NAs. To perform its tasks the COD may direct staff or form empowered committees of the whole as needed.
(2) COD decision-making


COD will make decisions based upon a majority vote, amendable later by the COD. Meetings will be
open to the public.
(3) Amending the DBP


Unless specifically stated, all such changes may be decided by the COD. The other sort of changes which require citywide vote work just like program specific proposals, except that such proposals go to the COD instead of to a CWC. These items are voted on at the same time as the City budget. Directors must meet together at least twice a year. One meeting shall occur prior to the city budget vote in June to vote on proposals to amend administrative tasks outlined in this article, or proposals to amend the funding of a given NA. In this meeting prior to June, Directors will also compile proposals intended to amend the process of the DBP and place these proposals on the ballot for the city budget vote in June.


VI: Citywide Committees
The purpose of Citywide Committees (CWCs) is to receive and synthesize department-specific program proposals from NAs, and to make proposals regarding the disposal of special (i.e. non-general) funds. CWCs make monthly reports to NAs.


(1)Formation


A CWC for a given department is convoked once one of the following occurs: 1) at least one NA in each City Council District approves a proposal specifically focused on that department, or 2) some set of Directors collectively representing NAs in each City Council District calls for the formation of such a CWC. Once convoked, a CWC exists throughout the year, and in perpetuity unless the COD votes to dissolve it.


(2) Composition and Meetings


CWCs are comprised of up to one delegate (and one backup delegate who will attend the CWC if
the main delegate is unable to) elected by each NA, and up to one delegate from the appropriate
City Department. Elections for CWC delegates are held every two years. CWC delegates can serve a
maximum of four consecutive terms. Quorum consists of at least 7 NA delegates. A CWC votes according to majority rule, until and unless it decides to change its voting procedure to require a higher threshold of agreement. CWCs meet at least once every two months. Their meetings are public in accordance with the usual meeting rules for deliberative bodies. The work of the CWCs is supported by DBP staff. The City shall make available space for the meetings of the CWCs. Departments are expected to share any and all information they currently share with the Mayor, City Administrator and City Council as pertaining to the development of the budget with the CWCs.

(3) Department-Specific Program Proposa


Throughout the year, a CWC receives proposals from NAs regarding the specific budget for their
Department. A voting member of an NA may submit a proposal on matters impacting the budget of
a specific department to be passed by the NA with majority approval. Approved proposals will then
be submitted to the appropriate Citywide Committee. The CWC reviews the proposals it receives and selects from and synthesizes those proposals into a single Departmental Program Proposal (DPP) to be submitted to the COD along with any explanatory materials. The COD will submit all such CWC proposals to vote at the yearly NA budget vote. The departments are encouraged to collaborate with the CWCs and may develop a joint budget proposal to be voted upon in the manner below.

(4) Special Funds Proposals
The CWC makes recommendations to the COD regarding the use of special funds for their department. The COD receives all such proposals from the CWCs and synthesizes them into a package to be voted on at the yearly NA budget vote. (See the section on the budget vote.)


VII. City Budget Vote
All aspects of the City budget heretofore decided by the City Council and Mayor are hereby decided by residents of Oakland in accordance with the process herein.


(1) Budget for the City Budget Vote


A budget in the amount required to hold an election for 20,000 voters shall be set aside for the annual budget vote. The COD may adjust that amount as needed. Any unused funds shall expire.


(2) Eligibility
All voting members who have attended at least two prior NA meetings during the current fiscal year may vote on the city budget. Participation of one NA in each council district is required for a citywide vote to occur. If this quorum is not met, the budget is decided by City Council.


(3) Ballot Distribution and Voting Procedure
Voting on the budget is to occur during a one week period in June. Copies of the ballot are to be

distributed no later than third week in May. During the allotted one-week period, each NA must
convene a special meeting dedicated to the budget vote. Each NA shall serve as a polling place.
For the purpose of voting on the city budget, all NAs shall have access to the same voting equipment and resources provided for other municipal elections. In accordance with state law, there will be a hand count of 1% of all ballots.


a) General Funds Allocation
The first section of the ballot will determine the allocation of general funds across all city departments. The voters will decide what percentage of the general fund will be allocated to each city department. Information on prior year allocations will be included on the ballot, as well as recommendations from CWCs and City Council. The function of each department will be briefly summarized on the ballot. The final allocation is simply the average of all the votes, with a blank vote counted as a vote to keep the amount the same as the prior year. The general funds allocation thus decided goes into effect in the second calendar year thereafter.


b) Special Funds Allocation
The second section of the ballot will determine allocation of special (i.e., non-general) funds among the City departments. Voters will decide between two allocation packages--i.e. slates combining all special funds: the allocation package recommended by the COD (which synthesizes proposals from the CWCs) and the allocation package recommended by City Council. The final result will be the average of the two packages as determined by the proportion of votes for each. A vote for both is counted as half a vote for both, and vote for neither is not counted. The general funds allocation thus decided goes into effect in the second calendar year thereafter.


c) Departmental Program Vote
The third section of the ballot will determine how the Departments are to spend their funds in the
following calendar year, given allocations previously determined either via the DBP process or, by
necessity at the beginning of DBP implementation, via prior City Council procedure.
For each department, voters will choose between up to two
departmental programming proposals
(DPP) which spell out how the department is to use its funds: a proposal submitted by the appropriate CWC and a proposal submitted by the Department staff. The DPP receiving the majority votes wins. If a CWC does not submit a proposal, the default winner is the Departmental staff proposal. A blank vote or an evenly split vote (extremely unlikely as it may be) is considered by default to be a vote for the Departmental staff recommendation.


8

Friday, October 26, 2012


Dear Friends,
It has been a long, rough road that has finally started to smooth out. It all started when I went to ask for an endorsement for my run for the People’s District 3 school board seat that has turned into a direct action. The months of planning and preparation became my sole focus. Though there has been a frequent difference of opinions, I believe I see truth in both sides and have never backed away from calling it as “I see it”. The action ended poorly despite having the success of holding the space with such minimal support from the actual community, and showing that “Occupy Oakland” is a movement not an organization. The action proved that you have to actually find information yourself (most of the local public did) and not trust the corporate media idea that “Occupy Oakland” is a group of unruly youths. It did that and more in my thoughts. We also had a wakeup call, realizing how far we have to go just among ourselves. I have concluded that we need to change the way we engage because the type of action that occurred at Lakeview is the kind that wins struggle, but only if it can be staffed fully. One flaw was that we had minimal support and needed to communicate better with those that do support.
 
After the action, a decision was made to move having been a few signatures short to get on the ballot and the drama around a bank mistake with rent, The recent month it took to move out was the toughest time I have ever gone through with the added mistake of lying costing me the obvious pain to my LPP, the separation of a dearest family member, and the realization Ihad lost another long before. So the main reason we had to over stay our lease was because of the loss of twins which I directly connect to the constant harassment by a house hold member. After repeated discussions about the difficulty with the pregnancy, he targeted my partner everytime I was away. All the way up to threatening to change the locks while we were at the hospital during the miscarriage. In direct result, we were not able to move on the 7th because in panic I paid for September to be safe. I am in a court case with him right now. It was the most difficult thing not to become my mother and take violent retribution for his direct attack on a person that had nothing to do with what was going on. I thank two of my brothers for being there to listen to me and help deflect the anger.
Now we are moved into a nice place in East Oakland, and I will get to run for the 2014 election for school board. This is better for me since the district I live and will run in now is the same district where I taught at Parker Elementary School in the OUSD. I know the struggle is not over, still living in the poverty line but I am looking into getting my class A license for driving tour busses as well as moving forward with looking for grants to start T.I.O. sports complex. We will be really on track after next August with the driving gigs to Monterey, but until then we will play economic juggling. Hopefully with a blessing, positive energy, and getting out to the people, we will win this November and we will be the loud people’s voice from inside city hall.
It feels good to be back
From love Peace Vicente


Thursday, August 16, 2012

Response email to the Occupy Oakland Education Committee on Mike Hutchinson email




Hi All, I also was not there to hear and see what was said but I will say this.....My personal opinion Mike about being a "member" of an organization that you are asking for the endorsement is right out of the status quo play book. Being on the sub-committee that is planing a candidate forum I feel the same. It is a conflict of interest. Which is why and other reasons why I did not become an official member and did not participate in the candidate forum committee.

Fact: I came to a OOEC meeting 2 months before the action seeking an endorsement for my run as well. Then was so pleased that I stayed to help with the action. You were not at any of those meetings, you would not take an official safety shift all though your company when you did come down was needed and helpful. Please stop using the action for your political career which could be why folks are triggered by your switch of political parties. As The Oakland Green Party has mentioned to you, your politics have all ready changed once you make statements like and I quote. "I have access to funds with the democratic party that I do not have as a green", you have told people you wanted to distance yourself from me and made an attempt to with hold NAACP knowledge. All fair in politics? Well having no staff I did not qualify but have no fear I will do it all on my own next time too and will get on and will win.

I still want to work with you but I will be speaking truth to power with no shame as I always have, I look forward to your thoughts as well. Please trust that this is written with no malice or anger. Peace V

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Voter pamhlet statement first draft

Vicente Cruz wants change, now. Cruz is your next OUSDBoard Candidate for People's District 3.Vicente desires that all OUSD students,regardless of poor socioeconomic status, be provided with the sameopportunities as any other child. He isvowing to fight tooth-and-nail against truancy and school closures, whilepassionately fighting to reinstate adult education and reinvent Oakland’sbudgeting techniques. Cruz knows that the current education funding needsto be radically redistributed in order to better benefit Oakland students. Heis vying for multilingual education programs, healthier eating, more frequentexercise programs, heavier emphasis on art and music, and more post-gradsupport for Oakland high school seniors. Vicente hasworked in education for 16 years in the Bay Area. Let Cruz fight for your students!

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

New web site



http://oaklandgreens.org/cruz/

http://oaklandgreens.org/



I will be learning how to edit the site tomorrow with Don Macleay, but stay up on the campaign and it is time to think about fund raising please pass this along. I believe I can win this election with no more than $5,000 of the $77,000 allowed for the oakland school board election. I need $600 of that in two weeks. Maximum donation is $99.99 please help.